Journal of Political Science and International Relations

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research Article |

The Nature and Dynamics of the Development of Russian-Turkish Relations in the Post-Soviet Period

The article examines the development of Russian-Turkish relations over the past 30years, the main aspects of geopolitical relations and, in particular, the conflicts in the South Caucasus and adjacent regions. The authors believe that the key ones are the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the 44-day war unleashed by Azerbaijan in 2020, the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict and the five-day Georgian-South Ossetian war, as well as the Ukrainian crisis, the Libyan and Syrian conflicts, in which Moscow and Ankara have different interests. Russia and Turkey consider conflicts as an important means of establishing influence in the region and use them to ensure the desired course of events in the region. The analysis of the above-mentioned conflicts is of key importance from the point of view of the Russian-Turkish geopolitical competition, because their inflammation led to the start of the rearrangement of the spheres of influence in the region. Moreover, the new configuration of forces in the South Caucasus will largely depend on the outcome of the resolution of these conflicts. The authors identify the main patterns in the development of bilateral Russian-Turkish relations, which are characterized by a combination of confrontation, competition and cooperation. This study is based on comparative and empirical methods, as well as the method of system analysis. Тhe authors studied the materials of Russian and Turkish official sources, and also analyzed the primary conclusions in the publications of Russian, Turkish, Armenian and other foreign researchers who have studied individual stages and pages of the topic under study over the past thirty years. The study of monographs and articles by Russian-speaking, English-speaking, Turkic-speaking authors is done in the original languages. During the post-Soviet period Russia and Türkiye have gained a lot of experience in developing a common attitude towards political and ethnic conflicts. It is noteworthy that during these conflicts relations between Russia and Türkiye even in the event of confrontation, did not deteriorate below a certain acceptable level. In all cases military-political and diplomatic channels of communication operated forcing the parties to take into account the cardinal interests of each other.

Russia, Turkey, South Caucasus, Geopolitical Rivalry, Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, Ukrainian Crisis

APA Style

Arshakyan, G. M., Safaryan, A. V. (2024). The Nature and Dynamics of the Development of Russian-Turkish Relations in the Post-Soviet Period. Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 7(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20240701.12

ACS Style

Arshakyan, G. M.; Safaryan, A. V. The Nature and Dynamics of the Development of Russian-Turkish Relations in the Post-Soviet Period. J. Polit. Sci. Int. Relat. 2024, 7(1), 15-21. doi: 10.11648/j.jpsir.20240701.12

AMA Style

Arshakyan GM, Safaryan AV. The Nature and Dynamics of the Development of Russian-Turkish Relations in the Post-Soviet Period. J Polit Sci Int Relat. 2024;7(1):15-21. doi: 10.11648/j.jpsir.20240701.12

Copyright © 2024 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Avatkov V. A. Ideological and Value Factor in Turkish Foreign Policy. Bulletin of MGIMO-University. 2019; 12(4), pp. 113-129 (In Russian).
2. Bagdasaryan S., Petrova S. Geopolitical positions of Russia and the USA in the Syrian conflict, State and municipal administration. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS, 2018; 2, pp. 110-115 (In Russian).
3. Greater Eurasia: Development, security, cooperation. Yearbook. Issue. 2. Part 2 / RAN. INION. Department of scientific cooperation; ed. Gerasimov. Moscow, 2019, 1040 p. (In Russian).
4. Gadzhiev K. S. Geopolitics of the Caucasus. Moscow, 2001, 463 p. (In Russian).
5. Safaryan Al., Pogosyan N. On the cooperation of Eurasian universities in the field of studying controversial issues “at the junction” of Armenian studies and Turkic studies. Selected pages of the Russian-Armenian strategic union. Yerevan, 2022, pp. 34-39 (In Russian).
6. Safrastyan R. On the ideological justification of the regional policy of Türkiye: the concept of Eurasia-South Caucasus: regional security and stability / Materials of the conf. General ed. of G Novikova. Ed. A. Melyan, S. Sargsyan. Transl. by A. Melyan. Yerevan, 2004, pp. 70-77 (In Russian).
7. Khachatryan G. D. The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict through the prism of relations between Armenia and Türkiye. Post-Soviet Studies. 2018, 1(2), pp. 221–231 (In Russian).
8. Allison R., Military Forces in the Soviet Successor States. The Adelphi Paper, 1993; 33(280), pp. 1-40.
9. Aras B. Davutoglu Era in Turkish Foreign Policy. Insight Türkiye, 2009; 11(3), pp. 127-142.
10. Aras B., Akpinar P. The Relations between Türkiye and the Caucasus. Perceptions, 2011 Autumn; XVI(3), pp. 53-68.
11. Bal I. The Turkish Model and the Turkic Republics. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs. 1998, September-November, pp. 1-17.
12. Celikpala M. From Immigrants to Diaspora: Influence of the North Caucasian diaspora in Türkiye. Middle Eastern Studies; 2016, May, 42(3), pp. 423-446.
13. Celikpala M. Türkiye as a Regional Power and the Caucasus. Insight Türkiye; 2007, 9(2), pp 25-30.
14. Demir S. Türkiye’s Foreign Policy and Security Perspectives in the 21st Century: Prospects and Challenges. Florida: Brown Walker Press, 2016, 350 p.
15. Devrim D. and Schulz E. The Caucasus: Which Role for Türkiye in the European Neighborhood? Insight Türkiye, 2009; 11.3, pp. 177-193.
16. Eissler E. R. Can Türkiye De-isolate Abkhazia? Turkish Policy Quarterly, 2013; 12(3), pp. 125-135.
17. Ereker F., Ozert U. Crimea in Turkish-Russian Relations: Identity, Discourse, or Interdependence. Athens Journal of Social Sciences. 2018, 5(4), pp. 371-388.
18. Fuller G. Türkiye Faces East: New Orientations toward the Middle East and the Old Soviet Union. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1992, 70 p.
19. Craig Nation R. Russia and the Caucasus. Connections; 2015, 14(2), pp. 1-12.
20. Hale W. Türkiye, the Black Sea and Transcaucasia, In Transcaucasia Boundaries. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996, 64 p.
21. Helvacikoylu G. The Role of Türkiye and Russia on the Resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. UPA Strategic Affairs, 2021, 2(1), pp. 158-174.
22. Kramer H. Will Central Asia Become Türkiye`s Sphere of Influence. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs. 1996, March-May, pp. 1-7.
23. Masumova R. N. Russia and Türkiye: Resetting Economic Partnership. Perceptions, 2018 Summer, XXIII (2), pp. 33-50.
24. Oniş Z., Yilmaz S. Türkiye and Russia in a Shifting Global Order: Cooperation, Conflict and Asymmetric Interdependence in a Turbulent Region. Third World Quarterly, 2016; 37(1), pp. 71-95.
25. Saakashvili M. Interview with Mikheil Saakashvili: Georgia’s Westward March. Turkish Policy Quarterly. 2013; 12(1), pp. 17-25.
26. Waal D. Th. Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan through Peace and War. New York and London: NYU Press, 2003, 360 p.
27. Weiss A., Zabanova Y. Georgia and Abkhazia Caught between Türkiye and Russia. SWP Comments 54: German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 2016 December, pp. 1–8.
28. Winrow M. G. Türkiye and Newly Independent States of Central Asia and Transcaucasus. Middle East Review of International Affairs Journal (MERIA). 1997; 1 (2-July), pp. 1-10.
29. Celikpala M. Turkiye ve Kafkasya: Reaksiyoner Dış Politikadan Proaktif Ritmik Diplomasiye Geciş. Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 7, Sayı 25, s. 93–126.
30. Davutoğlu A. Stratejik Derinlik: Turkiyenin Uluslararası Konumu, Istanbul, 2001, 584 s.
31. Yuksel E. Strategies of Turkish proxy warfare in northern Syria. CRU Report, 2019, November, pp. 1-24.