Journal of Political Science and International Relations

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research/Technical Note |

Peoples and Their Land from a Political Outlook (Metekel, Benishangul Gumuz, Ethiopia)

The people and land of the nation have a profound influence on its politics and economy. Therefore, the paper serves three main purposes: it first discusses the origins of the people in Metekel; it next covers the current status of settlement in Metekel; and last, it strikes a balance between the people and their land. To resolve this issue, historical evidence and linguistic evidence in particular was used. The work primarily presents and discusses the linguistic meanings of kebeles, towns, rivers, and other phenomena. As a result, the study's findings indicate that: (1) there is a relationship between the Arabic language and the land; it is crucial to look into whether the language's owner has relocated or changed their identity; (2) there are two ethnic groups that were overlooked: the Fugni (Gubewi), who are currently known as Gumuz in Ethiopia, and the people of Medhely (new group name origion from Amharawello and Benishangul Gumuz), who are best known for owning Masjid Arehman; (3) there are many hybrid ethnic personalities that a person had acquired from various ethnic groups in the study area, such as Gumuz and Wello, Agew and Oromo, Shinash and Amhara, etc. (4) The fourth discovery is that the Medheli and Funj (Gumuz) people are indigenous to the Metekel due to their close ties to the region's historical Arabic language. (5) Fifth, shash is not a native people in Benishangul Gumuz, notably in Metekel; rather, shash is an ethnic group similar to Agew, Amhara, Wello, and other tribes. Last but not least, the research suggests that a number of hybrid ethnic groups such as the Gumuz, Agew, Wello, Amhara, Shinasha, Kenbata, and others that were originally from various regions of Ethiopia, found in Metekel. Coexistence is therefore the ideal method of living for involvement in the future.

People, Land, Metekel, Linguistic, Funj, Medhely

APA Style

Adem, H. K. (2024). Peoples and Their Land from a Political Outlook (Metekel, Benishangul Gumuz, Ethiopia). Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 7(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20240701.13

ACS Style

Adem, H. K. Peoples and Their Land from a Political Outlook (Metekel, Benishangul Gumuz, Ethiopia). J. Polit. Sci. Int. Relat. 2024, 7(1), 22-29. doi: 10.11648/j.jpsir.20240701.13

AMA Style

Adem HK. Peoples and Their Land from a Political Outlook (Metekel, Benishangul Gumuz, Ethiopia). J Polit Sci Int Relat. 2024;7(1):22-29. doi: 10.11648/j.jpsir.20240701.13

Copyright © 2024 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Gebremichael, M., Federalism and Conflict Management in Ethiopia. Case Study of Benishangul-Gumuz Regional State. 2012, University of Bradford.
2. Mekonnen, T., The Benishangul-Gumuz Region: A Brief Political History, 1991-2001. Journal of Ethiopian Studies, 2021. 54(1): p. 7-38.
3. Habtu, A., Ethnic federalism in Ethiopia: Background, present conditions and future prospects. 2003.
4. Lenabo, L. G., Ethiopian Histore Sources and Tools (Amharic Version). 4th ed. 1999 E.c.
5. Greenberg, J. H., Linguistic evidence for the influence of the Kanuri on the Hausa. The Journal of African History, 1960. 1(2): p. 205-212.
6. Grace, G. W., The linguistic evidence. Current Anthropology, 1964. 5(5): p. 361-368.
7. Vonesh, J., Natural history and biogeography of the amphibians and reptiles of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Contemporary Herpetology, 2001: p. 1-16.
8. Chapman, C. A. and L. J. Chapman, Interdemic variation in mixed-species association patterns: common diurnal primates of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2000. 47(3): p. 129-139.
9. Endalew, T., “Christian Influences on Shinasha Oral Traditions”. 2009, Citeseer.
10. Haile, F. A., The Origin of Blin: an overview. Blin Democracy and Cultural Day, September, 2006. 9.
11. Malkki, L., National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees, in The cultural geography reader. 2008, Routledge. p. 287-294.
12. Pausewang, S., The two-faced Amhara identity. Scrinium, 2005. 1(1): p. 273-286.
13. Sadiq, K., Paper citizens: How illegal immigrants acquire citizenship in developing countries. 2008: Oxford University Press.
14. Sharma, P. R., Nation-building, multi-ethnicity, and the Hindu state, in Nationalism and Ethnicity in a Hindu Kingdom. 2012, Routledge. p. 471-493.
15. Tazebew, T., Amhara nationalism: The empire strikes back. African Affairs, 2021. 120(479): p. 297-313.
16. Zeleke, W. T., Dynamics of Inter-Ethnic Relations, Peaceful Co-Existence, Conflicts, and Peace Building Mechanisms Between the Gumuz and Non-Gumuz Communities (1961-1974). Dynamics, 2018. 38.
17. Fei, X., The formation and development of the Chinese nation with multi-ethnic groups. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 2017. 1: p. 1-31.
18. Sheth, D. L., Nation-building in multi-ethnic societies: The experience of South Asia. Alternatives, 1989. 14(4): p. 379-388.
19. Umer, M. I., The historical controversies of Bertha and Benishangul (Bel-shangul), Benishangul community, Ethiopia.